- #Fastrawviewer reviews full size
- #Fastrawviewer reviews full
- #Fastrawviewer reviews pro
- #Fastrawviewer reviews software
Someone mentions the fact the previews in FastRawViewer are blurry and a few offer convoluted excuses for the problem. Some people tell him about the good things in FastRawViewer. "Seems like an interesting product, but wondering if it incorporating it into your workflow really makes a difference in the quality of your edits?" Look at the last post by the OP - the guy is initially intrigued by FastRawViewer, but is not sure: Interesting thread that exemplifies what I have been saying: FastRawViewer looks like something good until you begin to realize it's totally useless! The developer dreams of latching onto the Lightroom bandwagon by tricking people into believing they need this software.
#Fastrawviewer reviews software
I just want to make sure potential users realize the bogus claims about this software providing some sort of 'solution' or 'benefit' are just that: bogus claims. That said, if a person wants to use it (for whatever reason) that's their business. And those who are below moderately skilled or are total beginners have less of a reason to be looking at meaningless, useless raw histograms! You can tell FastRawViewer is totaly useless because any moderately skilled user can easily spot sharpness, exposure and anything else from the preview offered by Lightroom, DxO, Capture One, etc. So, at best, FastRawShooter is a 'diagnostic' tool that nobody needs because the same diagnostics (exposure, sharpness, histogram, whatever) is offered by all raw converters in a much more user-friendly manner - along with the tools to fix any problems. Same story with any other raw converter of your choice.!!!! How uselees FastRawViewer is can be easily determined by noticing it offers access to a 'raw histogram' but there is nothing you can do with it, other than looking at meaningless numbers. Let's see: you look at your 'raw histogram' and then what? How do you use it? What is next? You have to go to Lightroom to look at Lightroom's ' defective' preview and ' defective' histogram and make decisions based on that ' defective' preview and that ' defective' histogram. It never mentions how it can be useful to people who use DxO, ACDSee, Capture One, Affinity Photo, etc. How useless FastRawViewer is can be easily determined by noticing it markets itself as some sort of 'solution' to a problem that does not exist in Lightroom. If a person can't tell how sharp or well exposed a picture is/isn't from looking at the Lightroom preview, something is wrong and that has nothing to do with Lightroom.įastRawViewer just adds a layer of extra clicks and work that users of mainstream raw converters don't need. From there I can right click and go right into Photoshop (ACR) to begin processing. until I am somewhat down the processing road, is determine how well focused the image is (quickly) and, if there is a clipping potential, how far I can go to recover highlights and shadows. Try it and you will see what I mean.īut what I can't do in Lightroom.
#Fastrawviewer reviews pro
I know this will sound effete or snobbery, but FRV is more pro grade, while Lightroom is consumer grade. And, since I prefer ACR anyway, much of LR is duplicitous for me. To me, FRV is lighter, more capable (in things I use) and less prone to issues than Lightroom. The makers of FRV told me they are working to integrate EXIF search, which would be great.
#Fastrawviewer reviews full
Not to mention the annoying system freeze that LR does occasionally, even on my full loaded 2017 iMac. There is no catalog to deal with - of course there are good things you can do with catalogs, but you can also do the same things with the finder and folders. When I insert a card into my card viewer I can select all in FRV and copy the images into my chosen image folder. I can (as I could in LR) quickly judge a set of photos from an aesthetic point of view.
#Fastrawviewer reviews full size
I have it set up to show thumbnails on one monitor, and a full size image view on the other. Rather, I will look at them in a set, and process the one I like best, then move to the next set.
I tend to do things in a slower, more methodical way, and I do not bring in hundreds of photos at a time, so I am not looking for a fast and easy way to cull images. I prefer to do my raw edits in ACR, and then in Photoshop. I have never liked Lightroom, yet I have owned it since the product was born, and still use it regularly.
Or, in fact, to be praiseworthy of something before you actually use it. It is always easy to be critical of something before you have actually used it.
0 kommentar(er)
